|
The following
was copied from the website at this link:
Given the testimony from today's
court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His
attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama. The
following is a nutshell account of the proceedings. Promptly at 9A.M
EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were
called to the Judge's chambers. This was indeed a very interesting
beginning to this long awaited and important case. The case revolved around the Natural Born clause
of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to
serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama's name would not
appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia. With the small courtroom crowded,
several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as
they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the
judge. Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to
appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a
campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court
in Georgia. Over the last several weeks,
Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to
keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed,
then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski
argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or
would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with
the duties of office to appear. After all these arguments were
dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the
Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and
declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client
would participate. Secretary of State, Brian Kemp,
fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon
the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his
clients peril. Game on. .  5 Minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, with the
attorneys in the judge's chambers. 20 minutes. It appears Jablonski is not
in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24
minutes after meeting in the judge's chambers. Has Obama's attorney made good on his stated
threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court's subpoena?
Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed
to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or,
non action? Certainly not. Court is called to order.
Obama's birth certificate is entered into evidence. Obama's
father's place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama's book, "Dreams from My Father" entered
into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966
or 1967 that his father's history is mentioned. It states that his
father's passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave
Kenya. Immigration Services documents entered into
evidence regarding Obama Sr. June 27th, 1962, is
the date on those documents. Obama's father's status shown as a non
citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom
of Information Act. Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born
Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court
written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference
between 'citizen' and 'Natural Born Citizen' using charts and copies of
the Minor vs Happersett opinion. It is also pointed out that the
14th Amendment
does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born.
It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the
Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs
Happersett opinion. The point is, to be a natural born
citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in
question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama's father was not a
citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to
serve as President. Judge notes that as Obama nor his
attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly. Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws
applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the
challenge to it by Swinson. 2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes
the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to
Obama's appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy. Court
records of Obama's mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into
evidence. RNC certificate of nomination entered into
evidence.  DNC language does NOT include
language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This
shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly
have known that Obama was not qualified. Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday
entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not
take place and that they would not participate. 'Dreams >From My
Father' entered. Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn
in. Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service
entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the
status of Obama's father received through the Freedom of Information
Act. This information states clearly that Obama's
father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen. At this point, the judge takes a
recess. The judge returns. David
Farrar takes the stand. Evidence showing Obama's book of records
listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the
judge. Orly Taitz calls
2nd witness.
Mr. Strunk. Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from
attorney showing a renewal form from Obama's mother for her passport
listing Obama's last name something other than Obama. State Licensed PI takes the
stand. She was hired to look into Obama's background and found a
Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given
that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in
1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This
shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was
indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by
Obama. .  Same SS number came up with
addresses in IL, D.C. and MA. Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He
testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different
parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original
document. Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not
verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is
the system by which the Government verifies ones
citizenship. Next witness. Mr. Vogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years. Mr. Vogt
testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is
suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by
'unsharp mask' in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this,
is considered to be a fraud. States this is a product of
layering. Mr. Vogt testifies that a straight scan of an
original document would not show such layering. Also testifies
that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact
same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama's
documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they
were NOT hand stamped but layered into the document by
computer. Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former
police officer and former immigration officer specializing in
immigration fraud. Ran Obama's SS number through database and
found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of
Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue,
Obama was living in Hawaii. Serial number on birth certificate
is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also
certification is different than others and different than twins born 24
hours ahead of Obama. Mr. Sampson also states that portion of
documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted
which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records. 
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth
records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be
filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out. Mr.
Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be
arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know
for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he
resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself. Testifies that records indicate
Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and
citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments. Taitz states
that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented,
ineligible to serve as President. And
with that, the judge closes the hearing. What can we take away
from this?
It's interesting. Now, all of this has finally been entered
OFFICIALLY into court records. One
huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered. WHO THE HELL IS
THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama's identity, his Social Security
number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in
question. One
thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the
definition of Natural Born Citizen' provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be
eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly
impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because
Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be
allowed on the Georgia ballot. It also opens
the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as
well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has 'a LOT' of explaining to do unless
they start looking for a new candidate for 2012. |